mercy – Discipline & Punish http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish Early American Crime Narratives Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:47:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.2 owen syllavan http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/owen-syllavan-3/ Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:26:39 +0000 http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/2007/06/04/owen-syllavan-3/ Continue reading ]]> 1. servant– a servant is generally thought of as a lowly person. he always has a master and must always perform duties of submissiveness. most of the time these services are rewarded by the master with some sort of payment. for example, “the gentleman told me if i would go and live with him, he would be my friend and relation, too.” and “i agreed with the captain to serve him three years more, for as many biscuits as i could eat.” this concept is also spiritual. through repentance and conversion, one’s ultimate goal is to become a servant of God performing Godly duties which will then be rewarded with a place in heaven.

2. guilt– being responsible for a crime, in Syllavan’s case always led to some degree of punishment, usually imprisonment, even if he was eventually acquitted. however, syllavan’s guilt led to other “torturous” punishments as well. “I received twenty lashes at the public whipping post.” and “i was branded in both cheeks with the letter R and cropt in both my ears.” these are significant because they are the first two accounts of “torturous” punishment used in any of these texts. in the 1700’s it seems that most offenses were at first punished with imprisonment which would hopefully result in the transformation of the soul. however, in syllavan’s case, the body, once again, became the target for punishment.

3. mercy– this forebearance was shown toward syllavan many times for his counterfeiting currency. the relationship between power and mercy becomes evident in this passage. the court having more power than syllavan granted him mercy by acquitting his crimes. at the same time, syllavan is left begging for God’s mercy-god being the supreme power-when the court no longer would.

]]>
owen syllavan http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/owen-syllavan/ Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:01:28 +0000 http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/2007/06/04/owen-syllavan/ Continue reading ]]> Guilt- Owen in no way denies that he is guilty of counterfeiting money, but seems to make a different conception of guilt than Esther or Patience.  Although he seems himself as guilty in the sense that he did it, he doesn’t seem particularly torn up or repentant.  The account of his life is a matter of fact record of what happened, what kind of money he reproduced, and how many times he escaped from jail.  If anything, there is a sort of pride in how tricky and clever he is, not any real shame.  His final mention of the concept of guilt is perhaps the most interesting, as he refuses to incriminate any of his accomplices, for he will not “be guilty of shedding their blood” (147).  Although naming his accomplices would be encouraged by the justice system, Owen is appealing to his own internal sense of guilt—one governed neither by the laws or religion, something that we saw for a brief moment when Patience Boston could not kill her child and did not know why. 

 

Bravery- Any sort of refusal on the gallows seems to be witnessed as a form of bravery—like William Fly’s refusal to pray and beg for mercy, Owen’s refusal to name his accomplices or give any information about the money he made seems somewhat brave as well.  When asked for more information about the counterfeited money, he says that people must find that out for themselves, and so, “died obstinate” (149).  His only words about the money or his accomplices is a request that they burn any incriminating evidence so that they don’t end up being hanged—not that they save their souls and change their evil ways.

 

Mercy-  For all his bravery and humor, Owen Sullivan gives himself away when he cries for mercy from God minutes before he dies, just as William Fly couldn’t hide his shaking knees.  We must wonder, of course, if either of these things really happened or it is merely the author inserting his own religious commentary, proving that even the most “brave” prisoners are fearful of death and the afterlife.  Owen cries out for God to have mercy on his soul, and then says the Lord’s prayer before dying, an odd ending to an account so devoid of any religious undertone.    

]]>
esther rodgers http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/esther-rodgers/ Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:01:47 +0000 http://blogs.elsweb.org/disciplinepunish/2007/06/03/esther-rodgers/ Continue reading ]]> Believing- Esther Rogers is told before her execution that if she believes in Jesus, she will be saved, which interestingly removes her from the whole dilemma of crime and punishment and places her problem in the larger realm of religion.  It is also contrary to the idea of God espoused in the introduction to Pillars of Salt, which argued that the judicial system saw itself as carrying out God’s will.  Here, a concept of religious right and wrong emerges as one drastically different form the one upheld by the justice system: believers are in the right, and non-believers in the wrong: “whoever believeth shall be saved” (101).  Her dying words express a sort of comfort in the fact that she has at last found religion, and thus hope, even while minutes away from certain death.

 

Mercy- Before her death, Esther is continually asking God for mercy, something that the justice system has already denied her.  She is so caught up with the idea that her belief in God will be her salvation that even though she admits that “my sins have deserved Hell”, she seems to expect a divine pardon, as “whosoever believeth on thee shall never dye” (107).  This obviously religious speech (and text in general), makes almost no reference to Esther’s guilt or innocence or to the fairness of her sentence or her trial: the religious aspect of punishment and redemption seems to become important only when hope of earthy redemption and mercy have failed.

 

Deserve- Esther repeats that she deserves both to die and to go to hell, although she dies asking God for mercy, something the public admires her for.  The question of what Esther “deserves” is another interesting difference between the two concepts of relationships between God and the judicial system: either the justice system is doing God’s work, what God would sentence criminals for if he could, or the justice system simply gives people what they “deserve”, not, as God would, something merciful, good, or kind.  This separation of goodness and justice, demonstrated by Esther’s appeal to God, is an interesting aspect of the vilification of the penal system.

]]>